This information is for educational purposes only. It is not intended as medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
ARANESP 100MCG Solution for injection in vial — Description, Dosage, Side Effects | PillsCard
Rx
ARANESP 100MCG Solution for injection in vial
130 mcg/0,65 ml (200 mcg/ml), Roztwór do wstrzykiwań
INN: Darbepoetinum alfa
Data updated: 2026-04-24
Available in:
🇨🇿🇬🇧🇫🇷🇯🇵🇵🇱🇸🇰🇹🇷🇺🇦
Form
Roztwór do wstrzykiwań
Dosage
130 mcg/0,65 ml (200 mcg/ml)
Route
dożylna, podskórna
Storage
—
User Reviews
Reviews reflect personal experiences and are not medical advice. Always consult your doctor.
About This Product
Manufacturer
Amgen Europe B.V. (Holandia)
Composition
Darbepoetinum alfa
ATC Code
B03XA02
Source
URPL
Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antianemic agents, other antianemic agents, ATC code: B03XA02.
Mechanism of action
Human erythropoietin is an endogenous glycoprotein hormone that is the primary regulator of erythropoiesis through specific interaction with the erythropoietin receptor on erythroid progenitor cells in the bone marrow. Erythropoietin production and its regulation occurs primarily in the kidneys in response to changes in tissue oxygenation. Endogenous erythropoietin production is impaired in patients with chronic renal failure, and erythropoietin deficiency is the primary cause of anaemia in these patients. In patients with malignant disease receiving chemotherapy, the aetiology of anaemia is multifactorial. In these patients, erythropoietin deficiency and a reduced response of erythroid progenitor cells to endogenous erythropoietin both contribute significantly to the development of anaemia.
Pharmacodynamic effects
Darbepoetin alfa stimulates erythropoiesis by the same mechanism as the endogenous hormone. Darbepoetin alfa has five nitrogen-linked carbohydrate chains, whereas the endogenous hormone and recombinant human erythropoietins (r-HuEPO) have three. The additional sugar residues are molecularly indistinguishable from those on the endogenous hormone. Due to its increased carbohydrate content, darbepoetin alfa has a longer terminal half-life than r-HuEPO and consequently greater in vivo activity. Despite these molecular differences, darbepoetin alfa retains a very narrow specificity for the erythropoietin receptor.
Clinical efficacy and safety
Patients with chronic renal failure
In patients with chronic renal failure, two clinical studies demonstrated a higher risk of death and serious cardiovascular events when ESAs were administered to achieve a higher target haemoglobin level compared with a lower target level (13.5 g/dl (8.4 mmol/l) versus 11.3 g/dl (7.1 mmol/l); 14 g/dl (8.7 mmol/l) versus 10 g/dl (6.2 mmol/l)).
In a randomised, double-blind correction study (n = 358) comparing once every two weeks and once monthly dosing regimens in non-dialysis patients with chronic renal failure, once monthly dosing of darbepoetin alfa was not inferior to once every two weeks dosing for the correction of anaemia. The median (interquartile range Q1–Q3) time to haemoglobin correction (≥ 10.0 g/dl and an increase of ≥ 1.0 g/dl from baseline) was 5 weeks for both dosing regimens: once every two weeks (Q1, Q3 – 3, 7 weeks) and once monthly (Q1, Q3 – 3, 9 weeks). During the evaluation period (weeks 29–33), the mean (95% CI) weekly equivalent dose was 0.20 (0.17; 0.24) μg/kg in the once every two weeks arm and 0.27 (0.23; 0.32) μg/kg in the once monthly arm.
In a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (TREAT), involving 4,038 non-dialysis patients with chronic renal failure with type 2 diabetes and haemoglobin levels ≤ 11 g/dl, patients received either darbepoetin alfa to achieve a haemoglobin level of 13 g/dl or placebo (with rescue darbepoetin alfa administration when haemoglobin levels fell below 9 g/dl). The study did not meet either primary endpoint of demonstrating a reduction in risk of all-cause mortality or cardiovascular morbidity (darbepoetin alfa vs placebo; Hazard Ratio 1.05; 95% CI (0.94; 1.17)), or all-cause mortality or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) (darbepoetin alfa vs placebo; HR 1.06; 95% CI (0.95; 1.19)). Analysis of the individual components of the composite endpoints showed the following HRs (95% CI): death 1.05 (0.92; 1.21), congestive heart failure (CHF) 0.89 (0.74; 1.08), myocardial infarction (MI) 0.96 (0.75; 1.23), stroke 1.92 (1.38; 2.68), hospitalisation for myocardial ischaemia 0.84 (0.55; 1.27), ESRD 1.02 (0.87; 1.18).
Pooled post-hoc analyses of clinical studies with ESAs were performed in patients with chronic renal failure (dialysis, non-dialysis, with diabetes and without diabetes). A tendency towards increased estimated risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events associated with higher cumulative ESA doses was observed independent of diabetes or dialysis status (see sections 4.2 and 4.4).
Paediatric population
In a randomised clinical study involving 114 dialysis and non-dialysis paediatric patients aged 2–18 years with chronic kidney disease suffering from anaemia (haemoglobin below 10.0 g/dl) who were not receiving ESA treatment, darbepoetin alfa was administered once weekly (n = 58) or once every two weeks (n = 56) for the correction of anaemia. Haemoglobin concentrations were corrected to ≥ 10 g/dl in more than 98% (p < 0.001) of paediatric patients receiving darbepoetin alfa once weekly and in 84% (p = 0.293) receiving it once every two weeks. At the time when a haemoglobin concentration of ≥ 10.0 g/dl was first achieved, the mean (SD) weight-based dose was 0.48 (0.24) μg/kg (range: 0.0 to 1.7 μg/kg) weekly for the once weekly group and 0.76 (0.21) μg/kg (range: 0.3 to 1.5 μg/kg) every two weeks for the once every two weeks group.
In a clinical study involving 124 dialysis and non-dialysis paediatric patients with chronic kidney disease aged 1–18 years who were stable on epoetin alfa treatment, patients were randomised either to receive darbepoetin alfa once weekly (subcutaneously or intravenously) using a conversion ratio of 238:1, or to continue epoetin alfa treatment at the current dose, schedule and route of administration. The primary efficacy endpoint [change in haemoglobin between the baseline and evaluation period (weeks 21–28)] was comparable between both groups. Mean baseline haemoglobin levels were 11.1 (SD 0.7) g/dl for r-HuEPO and 11.3 (SD 0.6) g/dl for darbepoetin alfa. Mean haemoglobin levels at week 28 were 11.1 (SD 1.4) g/dl for r-HuEPO and 11.1 (SD 1.1) g/dl for darbepoetin alfa.
In a European Observational Registry study enrolling 319 paediatric patients with chronic kidney disease (13 (4.1%) patients under 1 year of age, 83 (26.0%) patients aged 1 to 6 years, 90 (28.2%) patients aged 6 to 12 years and 133 (41.7%) patients aged 12 years and over) receiving darbepoetin alfa, mean haemoglobin concentrations ranged between 11.3 and 11.5 g/dl and mean weight-based darbepoetin alfa doses remained relatively constant (between 2.31 μg/kg per month and 2.67 μg/kg per month) throughout the observation period in the entire study population.
In these studies, no significant differences were found between the safety profile in paediatric patients and the previously reported safety profile in adult patients (see section 4.8).
Patients with malignant disease receiving chemotherapy
A randomised, open-label, multicentre study EPO-ANE-3010 was conducted in 2,098 anaemic women with metastatic breast cancer receiving first- or second-line chemotherapy. This was a non-inferiority study designed to exclude a 15% increase in the risk of tumour progression or death with epoetin alfa plus standard of care (SOC) compared with SOC alone. At the time of clinical database closure, median progression-free survival (PFS), based on investigator assessment of disease progression, was 7.4 months in each group (HR 1.09; 95% CI: 0.99; 1.20), indicating that the study objective was not met. Significantly fewer patients received RBC transfusions in the epoetin alfa plus SOC group (5.8% versus 11.4%); however, significantly more patients had thrombotic vascular events in the epoetin alfa plus SOC group (2.8% versus 1.4%). At the final analysis, 1,653 deaths were reported. Median overall survival in the epoetin alfa plus SOC group was 17.8 months compared with 18.0 months in the SOC alone group (HR 1.07; 95% CI: 0.97; 1.18). Median time to progression (TTP) based on investigator-assessed disease progression (PD) was 7.5 months in the epoetin alfa plus SOC group and 7.5 months in the SOC group (HR 1.099; 95% CI: 0.998; 1.210). Median TTP based on PD determined by an independent review committee (IRC) was 8 months in the epoetin alfa plus SOC group and 8.3 months in the SOC group (HR 1.033; 95% CI: 0.924; 1.156).
In a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in 314 patients with lung cancer receiving platinum-containing chemotherapy, the need for blood transfusion was significantly reduced (p < 0.001).
Clinical studies have demonstrated that darbepoetin alfa has similar efficacy when administered as a single injection once every three weeks, once every two weeks, or once weekly, without the need for an increase in the total dose.
In a randomised, double-blind, international study, the safety and efficacy of Aranesp administered once every three weeks for reducing the need for erythrocyte transfusions in patients receiving chemotherapy was assessed. The study included 705 anaemic patients with non-myeloid malignancies receiving multiple cycles of chemotherapy. Patients were randomised to receive either 500 µg of Aranesp once every three weeks or 2.25 µg/kg once weekly. In both groups, the dose was reduced by 40% (e.g. to 300 µg at the first reduction for the once every three weeks group and to 1.35 µg/kg for the once weekly group) if haemoglobin increased by more than 1 g/dl within 14 days. In the once every three weeks group, 72% of patients required dose reduction. In the once weekly group, 75% of patients required dose reduction. This study supports once every three weeks dosing of 500 µg as comparable to once weekly dosing with respect to the incidence of subjects receiving at least one erythrocyte transfusion from week 5 to the end of the treatment phase.
In a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study conducted in 344 anaemic patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies receiving chemotherapy, the need for blood transfusion was significantly reduced and haemoglobin response was improved (p < 0.001). An improvement in fatigue was also observed, as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-Fatigue) scale.
Erythropoietin is a growth factor that primarily stimulates red blood cell production. However, erythropoietin receptors may be present on the surface of various tumour cells.
In five large controlled studies involving a total of 2,833 patients, four of which were double-blind and placebo-controlled and one was open-label, survival and tumour progression were evaluated. Two of these studies included patients treated with chemotherapy. The target haemoglobin concentration was > 13 g/dl in two studies; in the remaining three studies it was 12–14 g/dl. In the open-label study, there was no difference in overall survival between patients treated with recombinant human erythropoietin and the control group. In the four placebo-controlled studies, the hazard ratios for overall survival ranged from 1.25 to 2.47 in favour of the control groups. These studies showed a consistent, unexplained, statistically significant increase in mortality in patients with anaemia associated with various common malignancies who received recombinant human erythropoietin compared with control groups. The overall survival outcome in the studies could not be satisfactorily explained by differences in the incidence of thrombosis and related complications between patients treated with recombinant human erythropoietin and those in the control group.
In a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study, 2,549 adult patients with anaemia receiving chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were randomised 2:1 to darbepoetin alfa or placebo and treated to a maximum Hb of 12 g/dl. Results showed non-inferiority for the primary endpoint of overall survival, with a median survival of 9.5 and 9.3 months for darbepoetin alfa and placebo, respectively (stratified HR 0.92; 95% CI: 0.83–1.01). The secondary endpoint of progression-free survival was 4.8 and 4.3 months, respectively (stratified HR 0.95; 95% CI: 0.87–1.04), thereby excluding the pre-defined 15% increase in risk.
A systematic review involving 9,000 patients with malignant disease in 57 clinical studies was also conducted. A meta-analysis of overall survival data yielded an estimated survival hazard ratio of approximately 1.08 in favour of control groups (95% CI: 0.99; 1.18; 42 studies and 8,167 patients). An increased relative risk of thromboembolic events was observed in patients treated with recombinant human erythropoietin (RR 1.67; 95% CI: 1.35; 2.06; 35 studies and 6,769 patients). There is therefore consistent evidence that there may be significant harm to patients with malignant disease who are treated with recombinant human erythropoietin. It is unclear to what extent these findings apply to the administration of recombinant human erythropoietin to patients with malignant disease treated with chemotherapy to achieve a haemoglobin concentration of less than 13 g/dl, as few patients with these characteristics were included in the controlled data.
A patient-level data analysis of more than 13,900 cancer patients (receiving chemotherapy, radiotherapy, both, or no treatment) participating in 53 controlled clinical studies with several epoetins was performed. A meta-analysis of overall survival data showed a hazard ratio of approximately 1.06 in favour of controls (95% CI: 1.00; 1.12; 53 studies and 13,933 patients), and for cancer patients treated with chemotherapy, the overall survival hazard ratio was 1.04 (95% CI: 0.97; 1.11; 38 studies and 10,441 patients). The meta-analysis also consistently showed a significantly increased relative risk of thromboembolic events in cancer patients treated with recombinant human erythropoietin (see section 4.4).
⚠️ Warnings
General
For improved traceability of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs), the trade name of the administered ESA should be clearly recorded (or stated) in the patient's medical records.
Blood pressure should be monitored in all patients, particularly during the initiation of Aranesp therapy. If blood pressure is difficult to control by the initiation of appropriate measures, the haemoglobin level may be reduced by reducing or withholding the Aranesp dose (see section 4.2). Cases of severe hypertension including hypertensive crisis, hypertensive encephalopathy and convulsions have been observed in patients with chronic renal failure treated with Aranesp.
To ensure effective erythropoiesis, iron status should be evaluated in all patients before and during treatment, and supplemental iron therapy may need to be considered.
Lack of response to Aranesp therapy should prompt a search for causative factors. Deficiencies in iron, folic acid or vitamin B12 reduce the efficacy of ESAs and should be corrected. The response to erythropoietin therapy may also be adversely affected by intercurrent infection, inflammatory episodes or trauma, occult blood loss, haemolysis, severe aluminium toxicity, underlying haematological disease or bone marrow fibrosis. The reticulocyte count should be considered as part of the evaluation. If typical causes of non-response are excluded and the patient has reticulocytopenia, an examination of the bone marrow should be considered. If the bone marrow is consistent with PRCA, testing for anti-erythropoietin antibodies should be performed.
Serious cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), which can be life-threatening or fatal, have been reported in association with epoetin treatment. More severe cases have been observed with long-acting epoetins.
At the time of prescribing, patients must be advised of the signs and symptoms of cutaneous reactions and closely monitored. If signs and symptoms suggestive of these adverse reactions appear, Aranesp must be immediately discontinued and an alternative treatment considered. If a patient has developed a serious cutaneous reaction such as SJS or TEN in connection with Aranesp use, treatment with Aranesp must never be reinitiated in that patient.
Pure red cell aplasia caused by neutralising anti-erythropoietin antibodies has been reported in association with ESAs including Aranesp. These reports have predominantly involved patients with chronic renal failure receiving subcutaneous treatment. These antibodies have been shown to cross-react with all erythropoietin proteins, and patients with suspected or confirmed neutralising antibodies to erythropoietin should not be switched to Aranesp (see section 4.8).
In the event of a paradoxical decrease in haemoglobin and the development of severe anaemia associated with low reticulocyte counts, epoetin treatment must be discontinued and anti-erythropoietin antibody testing should be performed. Cases have been reported in patients with hepatitis C treated with interferon and ribavirin concurrently with epoetins. Epoetins are not approved for the treatment of anaemia associated with hepatitis C.
Active liver disease was an exclusion criterion in all studies with Aranesp; therefore, no data are available for patients with impaired liver function. As the liver is considered to be the main elimination pathway for darbepoetin alfa and r-HuEPO, Aranesp should be used with caution in patients with liver disease.
Aranesp should also be used with caution in patients with sickle cell anaemia.
Misuse of Aranesp by healthy individuals may lead to an excessive increase in packed cell volume. This may be associated with life-threatening cardiovascular complications.
The needle cover of the pre-filled syringe or pre-filled pen contains dry natural rubber (a latex derivative), which may cause allergic reactions.
Aranesp should be used with caution in patients with epilepsy. Convulsions have been reported in patients receiving Aranesp.
The reported risk of thrombotic vascular events (TVEs) should be carefully weighed against the benefits derived from treatment with darbepoetin alfa, particularly in patients with pre-existing risk factors for TVEs, including obesity and a history of TVEs (e.g. deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and cerebrovascular accident).
This medicinal product contains less than 1 mmol (23 mg) of sodium per dose, that is to say essentially "sodium-free".
Patients with chronic renal failure
The maintenance haemoglobin concentration in patients with chronic renal failure should not exceed the upper limit of the target concentration recommended in section 4.2. In clinical studies, an increased risk of death, serious cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events including stroke and vascular access thrombosis was observed when ESAs were administered to target haemoglobin levels above 12 g/dl (7.5 mmol/l).
Dose escalation of Aranesp should be undertaken with caution in patients with chronic renal failure, as high cumulative epoetin doses may be associated with an increased risk of mortality, serious cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. In patients with a poor haemoglobin response to epoetins, alternative explanations for the poor response should be considered (see sections 4.2 and 5.1).
Controlled clinical studies have not shown significant benefits attributable to the administration of epoetins when haemoglobin concentration was raised beyond the level necessary to control symptoms of anaemia and to avoid blood transfusions.
Supplemental iron therapy is recommended for all patients with serum ferritin values below 100 µg/l or transferrin saturation below 20%.
Serum potassium levels should be monitored regularly during Aranesp therapy. Potassium elevation has been reported in a few patients receiving Aranesp, though a causal relationship has not been established. If an elevated or rising potassium level is observed, consideration should be given to discontinuing Aranesp administration until the potassium level has been corrected.
Patients with malignant disease
Effect on tumour growth
Epoetins are growth factors that primarily stimulate red blood cell production. However, erythropoietin receptors may be present on the surface of various tumour cells. As with all growth factors, there is a concern that epoetins could stimulate the growth of malignant tumours. In several controlled studies in anaemic patients with malignant disease, epoetins have not improved overall survival or decreased the risk of tumour progression.
The use of Aranesp and other ESAs in controlled clinical studies has shown:
shortened time to tumour progression in patients with advanced head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy when administered to target a haemoglobin level above 14 g/dl (8.7 mmol/l); ESAs are not indicated for use in this patient population.
shortened overall survival and increased deaths attributable to disease progression at 4 months in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving chemotherapy when administered to target a haemoglobin level of 12–14 g/dl (7.5–8.7 mmol/l).
increased risk of death when administered to target a haemoglobin level of 12 g/dl (7.5 mmol/l) in patients with active malignant disease receiving neither chemotherapy nor radiotherapy. ESAs are not indicated for use in this patient population.
an observed 9% increase in the risk of disease progression or death in the epoetin alfa plus standard of care (SOC) group from the primary analysis, and a 15% increase in risk that cannot be statistically excluded, in patients with metastatic breast cancer receiving chemotherapy when administered to achieve a haemoglobin concentration range of 10 to 12 g/dl (6.2 to 7.5 mmol/l).
non-inferiority of darbepoetin alfa compared with placebo for overall survival and progression-free survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy when administered to achieve a target haemoglobin of 12 g/dl (7.5 mmol/l) (see section 5.1).
In view of the above, blood transfusion should be the preferred treatment for the management of anaemia in cancer patients in some clinical situations. The decision to administer recombinant erythropoietins should be based on a benefit-risk assessment with the participation of the individual patient, which should take into account the specific clinical context. Factors that should be considered include the type of tumour and its stage; the degree of anaemia, life expectancy, the setting in which the patient is being treated; and patient preference (see section 5.1).
In patients with solid tumours or lymphoproliferative malignancies, if the haemoglobin value exceeds 12 g/dl (7.5 mmol/l), the dose adjustment scheme described in section 4.2 should be closely followed in order to minimise the potential risk of thromboembolic events.
Platelet counts and haemoglobin concentrations should be monitored at regular intervals.