Reviews reflect personal experiences and are not medical advice. Always consult your doctor.
About This Product
Manufacturer
Merck Sharp & Dohme B.V. (Belgia)
Composition
Elbasvirum 50 mg, Grazoprevirum 100 mg
ATC Code
J05AP54
Source
URPL
Pharmacotherapeutic group: Antivirals for systemic use, Direct acting antivirals, Antivirals for treatment of HCV infections, ATC code: J05AP54.
Mechanism of action
ZEPATIER combines two direct-acting antiviral agents with distinct mechanisms of action and non-overlapping resistance profiles to target HCV at multiple steps in the viral lifecycle.
Elbasvir is an inhibitor of HCV NS5A, which is essential for viral RNA replication and virion assembly.
Grazoprevir is an inhibitor of the HCV NS3/4A protease which is necessary for the proteolytic cleavage of the HCV encoded polyprotein (into mature forms of the NS3, NS4A, NS4B, NS5A, and NS5B proteins) and is essential for viral replication. In a biochemical assay, grazoprevir inhibited the proteolytic activity of the recombinant NS3/4A protease enzymes from HCV genotypes 1a, 1b, 3 and 4a with IC50 values ranging from 4 to 690 pM.
Antiviral activity
The EC
50
values of elbasvir and grazoprevir against full-length or chimeric replicons encoding NS5A or NS3 sequences from reference sequences and clinical isolates are presented in Table 5.
Table 5: Activities of elbasvir and grazoprevir in GT1a, GT1b and GT4 reference sequences and clinical isolates in replicon cells
Elbasvir
Grazoprevir
Reference
EC
50
nM
GT1a (H77)
0.004
0.4
GT1b (con 1)
0.003
0.5
GT4 (ED43)
0.0003
0.3
Clinical Isolates
Median EC
50
(range) nM
GT1a
0.005 (0.003 – 0.009)
a
0.8 (0.4 – 5.1)
d
GT1b
0.009 (0.005 – 0.01)
b
0.3 (0.2 – 5.9)
e
GT4
0.0007 (0.0002 – 34)
c
0.2 (0.11 – 0.33)
a
Number of isolates tested: a=5, b=4, c=14, d=10, e=9
Resistance
In cell culture
HCV replicons with reduced susceptibility to elbasvir and grazoprevir have been selected in cell culture for genotypes 1a, 1b and 4.
For elbasvir, in HCV genotype 1a replicons, single NS5A substitutions Q30D/E/H/R, L31M/V and Y93C/H/N reduced elbasvir antiviral activity by 6- to 2,000-fold. In genotype 1b replicons, single NS5A substitutions L31F and Y93H reduced elbasvir antiviral activity by 17-fold. In genotype 4 replicons, single NS5A substitutions L30S, M31V, and Y93H reduced elbasvir antiviral activity by 3- to 23-fold. In general, in HCV genotype 1a, 1b or 4 combinations of elbasvir resistance-associated substitutions further reduced elbasvir antiviral activity.
For grazoprevir, in HCV genotype 1a replicons, single NS3 substitutions D168A/E/G/S/V reduced grazoprevir antiviral activity by 2- to 81-fold. In genotype 1b replicons, single NS3 substitutions F43S, A156S/T/V, and D168A/G/V reduced grazoprevir antiviral activity by 3- to 375-fold. In genotype 4 replicons, single NS3 substitutions D168A/V reduced grazoprevir antiviral activity by 110- to 320-fold. In general, in HCV genotype 1a, 1b or 4 replicons, combinations of grazoprevir resistance-associated substitutions further reduced grazoprevir antiviral activity.
In clinical studies
In a pooled analysis of subjects treated with regimens containing elbasvir/grazoprevir or elbasvir + grazoprevir with or without ribavirin in Phase 2 and 3 clinical studies, resistance analyses were conducted for 50 subjects who experienced virologic failure and had sequence data available (6 with on-treatment virologic failure, 44 with post-treatment relapse).
Treatment-emergent substitutions observed in the viral populations of these subjects based on genotypes are shown in Table 6. Treatment-emergent substitutions were detected in both HCV drug targets in 23/37 (62 %) genotype 1a, 1/8 (13 %) genotype 1b and 2/5 (40 %) genotype 4 subjects.
Table 6: Treatment-emergent amino acid substitutions in the pooled analysis of ZEPATIER with and without ribavirin regimens in Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical studies
Target
Emergent Amino Acid Substitutions
Genotype 1a
N = 37
% (n)
Genotype 1b
N = 8
% (n)
Genotype 4
N = 5
% (n)
NS5A
Any of the following NS5A substitutions: M/L28A/G/T/S* Q30H/K/R/Y, L/M31F/M/I/V, H/P58D, Y93H/N/S
81% (30)
88% (7)
100% (5)
M/L28A/G/T/S
19% (7)
13% (1)
60% (3)
Q30H/K/Y
14% (5)
--
--
Q30R
46% (17)
--
--
L/M31M/F/I/V
†
11% (4)
25% (2)
40% (2)
H/P58D
‡
5% (3)
--
20% (1)
Y93H/N/S
14% (5)
63% (5)
20% (1)
NS3
Any of the following NS3 substitutions: V36L/M, Y56F/H, V107I, R155I/K, A156G/M/T/V, V158A, D168A/C/E/G/N/V/Y, V170I
78% (29)
25% (2)
40% (2)
V36L/M
11% (4)
--
--
Y56F/H
14% (5)
13% (1)
--
V107I
3% (1)
13% (1)
--
R155I/K
5% (2)
--
--
A156T
27% (10)
13% (1)
20% (1)
A156G/V/M
8% (3)
--
60% (3)
V158A
5% (2)
--
--
D168A
35% (13)
--
20% (1)
D168C/E/G/N/V/Y
14% (5)
--
20% (1)
V170I
--
--
20% (1)
*Reference sequences for NS5A at amino acid 28 are M (genotype 1a) and L (genotype 1b and genotype 4a and 4d).
†Reference sequences for NS5A at amino acid 31 are L (genotype 1a and genotype 1b) and M (genotype 4a and 4d).
‡Reference sequences for NS5A at amino acid 58 are H (genotype 1a) and P (genotype 1b and genotype 4a and 4d).
Cross-resistance
Elbasvir is active
in vitro
against genotype 1a NS5A substitutions, M28V and Q30L, genotype 1b substitutions, L28M/V, R30Q, L31V, Y93C, and genotype 4 substitution, M31V, which confer resistance to other NS5A inhibitors. In general, other NS5A substitutions conferring resistance to NS5A inhibitors may also confer resistance to elbasvir. NS5A substitutions conferring resistance to elbasvir may reduce the antiviral activity of other NS5A inhibitors.
Grazoprevir is active
in vitro
against the following genotype 1a NS3 substitutions which confer resistance to other NS3/4A protease inhibitors: V36A/L/M, Q41R, F43L, T54A/S, V55A/I, Y56F, Q80K/R, V107I, S122A/G/R/T, I132V, R155K, A156S, D168N/S, I170T/V. Grazoprevir is active
in vitro
against the following genotype 1b NS3 substitutions conferring resistance to other NS3/4A protease inhibitors: V36A/I/L/M, Q41L/R, F43S, T54A/C/G/S, V55A/I, Y56F, Q80L/R, V107I, S122A/G/R, R155E/K/N/Q/S, A156G/S, D168E/N/S, V170A/I/T. Some NS3 substitutions at A156 and at D168 confer reduced antiviral activity to grazoprevir as well as to other NS3/4A protease inhibitors.
The substitutions associated with resistance to NS5B inhibitors do not affect the activity of elbasvir or grazoprevir.
Persistence of resistance-associated substitutions
The persistence of elbasvir and grazoprevir treatment-emergent amino acid substitutions in NS5A, and NS3, respectively, was assessed in genotype 1-infected subjects in Phase 2 and 3 studies whose virus had treatment-emergent resistance-associated substitution in the drug target, and with available data through at least 24 weeks post-treatment using population (or Sanger) sequencing.
Viral populations with treatment-emergent NS5A resistance-associated substitutions were generally more persistent than NS3 resistance associated substitutions. Among genotype 1a-infected subjects, NS5A resistance-associated substitutions persisted at detectable levels at follow-up week 12 in 95% (35/37) of subjects and in 100% (9/9) of subjects with follow-up week 24 data. Among genotype 1b-infected subjects, NS5A resistance-associated substitutions persisted at detectable levels in 100% (7/7) of subjects at follow-up week 12 and in 100% (3/3) of subjects with follow-up week 24 data.
Among genotype 1a-infected subjects, NS3 resistance-associated substitutions persisted at detectable levels at follow-up week 24 in 31% (4/13) of subjects. Among genotype 1b-infected subjects, NS3 resistance-associated substitutions persisted at detectable levels at follow-up week 24 in 50% (1/2) of subjects.
Due to the limited number of genotype 4-infected subjects with treatment emergent NS5A and NS3 resistance associated substitutions, trends in persistence of treatment emergent substitutions in this genotype could not be established.
The long-term clinical impact of the emergence or persistence of virus containing ZEPATIER resistance-associated substitutions is unknown.
Effect of baseline HCV polymorphisms on treatment response
In pooled analyses of subjects who achieved SVR12 or met criteria for virologic failure, the prevalence and impact of NS5A polymorphisms (including M28T/A, Q30E/H/R/G/K/D, L31M/V/F, H58D, and Y93C/H/N) and NS3 polymorphisms (substitutions at positions 36, 54, 55, 56, 80, 107, 122, 132, 155, 156, 158, 168, 170, and 175) that confer greater than 5-fold reduction of elbasvir and grazoprevir antiviral activity respectively
in vitro
were evaluated. The observed treatment response differences by treatment regimen in specific patient populations in the presence or absence of baseline NS5A or NS3 polymorphisms are summarised in Table 7.
Table 7: SVR in GT1a-, GT1b- or treatment-experienced GT4-infected subjects bearing baseline NS5A or NS3 polymorphisms
SVR12 by Treatment Regimen
ZEPATIER, 12 Weeks
ZEPATIER + RBV, 16 Weeks
Patient Population
Subjects without baseline NS5A polymorphisms,
*
% (n/N)
Subjects with baseline NS5A polymorphisms,
*
% (n/N)
Subjects without baseline NS5A polymorphisms,
*
% (n/N)
Subjects with baseline NS5A polymorphisms,
*
% (n/N)
GT1a
†
97%
(464/476)
53%
(16/30)
100%
(51/51)
100%
(4/4)
GT1b
‡
99%
(259/260)
92%
(36/39)
Subjects without baseline NS3 polymorphisms,
¶
% (n/N)
Subjects with baseline NS3 polymorphisms,
¶
% (n/N)
GT4
(treatment-experienced)
♯
86%
(25/29)
100%
(7/7)
*
NS5A polymorphisms (conferring > 5-fold potency loss to elbasvir) included M28T/A, Q30E/H/R/G/K/D, L31M/V/F, H58D, and Y93C/H/N
†
Overall prevalence of GT1a-infected subjects with baseline NS5A polymorphisms in the pooled analyses was 7% (55/825)
‡
Overall prevalence of GT1b-infected subjects with baseline NS5A polymorphisms in the pooled analyses was 14% (74/540)
¶
NS3 polymorphisms considered were any amino acid substitution at positions 36, 54, 55, 56, 80, 107, 122, 132, 155, 156, 158, 168, 170, and 175.
♯
Overall prevalence of GT4-infected subjects with baseline NS3 polymorphisms in the pooled analyses was 19% (7/36)
Clinical efficacy and safety
The safety and efficacy of elbasvir/grazoprevir (co-administered as a fixed-dose combination; EBR/GZR) or elbasvir + grazoprevir (co-administered as single agents; EBR + GZR) were evaluated in 8 adult clinical studies and 1 paediatric clinical study in approximately 2,000 subjects (see Table 8).
Table 8: Studies conducted with ZEPATIER
Study
Population
Study Arms and Duration
(Number of Subjects Treated)
Additional Study Details
C-EDGE TN
(double-blind)
GT 1, 4, 6
TN with or without cirrhosis
• EBR/GZR* for 12 weeks (N=316)
• Placebo for 12 weeks (N=105)
Placebo-controlled study in which subjects were randomised in a 3:1 ratio to: EBR/GZR for 12 weeks (immediate treatment group [ITG]) or placebo for 12 weeks followed by open-label treatment with EBR/GZR for 12 weeks (deferred treatment group (DTG)).
C-EDGE COINFECTION
(open-label)
GT 1, 4, 6
TN with or without cirrhosis
HCV/HIV-1 co-infection
• EBR/GZR for 12 weeks (N=218)
C-SURFER
(double-blind)
GT 1
TN or TE with or without cirrhosis
Chronic Kidney Disease
• EBR* + GZR* for 12 weeks (N=122)
• Placebo for 12 weeks (N=113)
Placebo-controlled study in subjects with CKD Stage 4 (eGFR 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m2) or Stage 5 (eGFR < 15 mL/min/1.73 m2), including subjects on hemodialysis, Subjects were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following treatment groups: EBR + GZR for 12 weeks (ITG) or placebo for 12 weeks followed by open-label treatment with EBR/GZR for 12 weeks (DTG). In addition, 11 subjects received open-label EBR + GZR for 12 weeks (intensive PK arm).
C-WORTHY
(open-label)
GT 1, 3
TN with or without cirrhosis
TE Null Responder with or without cirrhosis
TN HCV/HIV-1 co-infection without cirrhosis
• EBR* + GZR* for 8, 12, or 18 weeks (N=31, 136, and 63, respectively)
• EBR* + GZR* + RBV† for 8, 12, or 18 weeks (N=60, 152, and 65, respectively)
Multi-arm, multi-stage study.
Subjects with GT 1b infection without cirrhosis were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to EBR + GZR with or without RBV for 8 weeks.
TN subjects with GT 3 infection without cirrhosis were randomised to EBR + GZR with RBV for 12 or 18 weeks.
TN subjects with GT 1 infection with or without cirrhosis (with or without HCV/HIV-1 co-infection) or who were peg-IFN + RBV null responders, were randomised to EBR + GZR with or without RBV for 8, 12 or 18 weeks.
C-SCAPE
(open-label)
GT 4, 6
TN without cirrhosis
• EBR* + GZR* for 12 weeks (N=14)
• EBR* + GZR* + RBV† for 12 weeks (N=14)
Subjects were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to the study arms.
C-EDGE TE
(open-label)
GT 1, 4, 6
TE with or without cirrhosis, and with or without
HCV/HIV-1 co-infection
• EBR/GZR for 12 or 16 weeks (N=105 and 105, respectively)
• EBR/GZR + RBV† for 12 or 16 weeks (N=104 and 106, respectively)
Subjects were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to the study arms.
C-SALVAGE
(open-label)
GT 1
TE with HCV protease inhibitor regimen
‡
with or without cirrhosis
• EBR* + GZR* + RBV
†
for 12 weeks (N=79)
Subjects who had failed prior treatment with boceprevir, simeprevir, or telaprevir in combination with peg-IFN + RBV received EBR + GZR with RBV for 12 weeks.
C-EDGE COSTAR
(double-blind)
GT 1, 4, 6
TN with or without cirrhosis Opiate agonist therapy
• EBR/GZR for 12 weeks (N=201)
• Placebo for 12 weeks (N=100)
Placebo-controlled study in which subjects were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to EBR/GZR for 12 weeks (ITG) or placebo for 12 weeks followed by open-label treatment with EBR/GZR for 12 weeks (DTG). Subjects were not excluded or discontinued from the trial based on a positive urine drug screen.
MK-5172A-079
(open-label)
GT 1, 4
TN or TE pediatric subjects
• EBR/GZR for 12 weeks (N=22)
Non-randomised, single-arm, open-label study in treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced pediatric subjects, including 22 subjects 12 years to less than 18 years of age, with chronic Hepatitis C (CHC) GT 1 or 4 infection without cirrhosis who received EBR/GZR for 12 weeks.
GT = Genotype
TN = Treatment-Naïve
TE = Treatment-Experienced (failed prior treatment with interferon [IFN] or peginterferon alfa [peg-IFN] with or without ribavirin (RBV) or were intolerant to prior therapy)
*EBR = elbasvir 50 mg; GZR = grazoprevir 100 mg; EBR/GZR = co-administered as a fixed-dose combination; EBR + GZR = co-administered as separate single agents
†
RBV was administered at a total daily dose of 800 mg to 1,400 mg based on weight (see section 4.2)
‡
Failed prior treatment with boceprevir, telaprevir, or simeprevir in combination with peg-IFN + RBV
Sustained virologic response (SVR) was the primary endpoint in all studies and was defined as HCV RNA less than the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ: 15 HCV RNA IU/mL except in C-WORTHY and C-SCAPE [25 HCV RNA IU/mL]) at 12 weeks after the cessation of treatment (SVR12).
Among genotype 1b/1 other-infected subjects, the median age was 55 years (range: 22 to 82); 61% were male; 60 % were White; 20% were Black or African American; 6% were Hispanic or Latino; 82% were treatment-naïve subjects; 18% were treatment-experienced subjects; mean body mass index was 26 kg/m2; 64 % had baseline HCV RNA levels greater than 800,000 IU/mL; 22 % had cirrhosis; 71% had non-C/C IL28B alleles (CT or TT); 18 % had HCV/HIV-1 co-infection.
Treatment outcomes in genotype 1b-infected subjects treated with elbasvir/grazoprevir for 12 weeks are presented in Table 9.
Table 9: SVR in genotype 1b
†
-infected subjects
¶
Baseline Characteristics
SVR
EBR with GZR for 12 weeks (N = 312)
Overall SVR
96% (301/312)
Outcome for subjects without SVR
On-treatment virologic failure
*
0% (0/312)
Relapse
1% (4/312)
Other
‡
2% (7/312)
SVR by cirrhosis status
Non-cirrhotic
95% (232/243)
Cirrhotic
100% (69/69)
†
Includes four subjects infected with genotype 1 subtypes other than 1a or 1b.
¶
Includes subjects from C-EDGE TN, C-EDGE COINFECTION, C-EDGE TE, C-WORTHY and C-SURFER.
*
Includes subjects with virologic breakthrough.
‡
Other includes subjects who discontinued due to adverse event, lost to follow-up, or subject withdrawal.
Among genotype 1a-infected subjects, the median age was 54 years (range: 19 to 76); 71 % were male; 71 % were White; 22 % were Black or African American; 9% were Hispanic or Latino; 74% were treatment-naïve subjects; 26% were treatment-experienced subjects; mean body mass index was 27 kg/m2; 75 % had baseline HCV RNA levels greater than 800,000 IU/mL; 23 % had cirrhosis; 72% had non-C/C IL28B alleles (CT or TT); 30 % had HCV/HIV-1 co-infection.
Treatment outcomes in genotype 1a-infected subjects treated with elbasvir/grazoprevir for 12 weeks or elbasvir/grazoprevir with ribavirin for 16 weeks are presented in Table 10.
Table 10: SVR in genotype 1a-infected subjects
¶
Baseline Characteristics
SVR
EBR with GZR
EBR with GZR + RBV
12 Weeks
16 Weeks
N=519
N=58
Overall SVR
93% (483/519)
95% (55/58)
Outcome for subjects without SVR
On-treatment virologic failure
*
1% (3/519)
0% (0/58)
Relapse
4% (23/519)
0% (0/58)
Other
‡
2% (10/519)
5% (3/58)
SVR by cirrhosis status
Non-cirrhotic
93% (379/408)
92% (33/36)
Cirrhotic
94% (104/111)
100% (22/22)
SVR by presence of baseline NS5A resistance-associated polymorphisms
†, §
Absent
97% (464/476)
100% (51/51)
Present
53% (16/30)
100% (4/4)
SVR by baseline HCV RNA
<=800,000 IU/mL
98% (135/138)
100% (9/9)
>800,000 IU/mL
91% (348/381)
94% (46/49)
¶
Includes subjects from C-EDGE TN, C-EDGE COINFECTION, C-EDGE TE, C-WORTHY and C-SURFER.
*
Includes subjects with virologic breakthrough.
‡
Other includes subjects who discontinued due to adverse event, lost to follow-up, or subject withdrawal.
†
Includes subjects with baseline sequencing data and who either achieved SVR12 or met criteria for virologic failure.
§
GT1a NS5A polymorphisms: M28T/A, Q30E/H/R/G/K/D, L31M/V/F, H58D, and Y93C/H/N.
Among genotype 4-infected subjects, the median age was 51 years (range: 28 to 75); 66 % were male; 88 % were White; 8 % were Black or African American; 11% were Hispanic or Latino; 77% were treatment-naïve subjects; 23% were treatment-experienced subjects; mean body mass index was 25 kg/m2; 56 % had baseline HCV RNA levels greater than 800,000 IU/mL; 22 % had cirrhosis; 73% had non-C/C IL28B alleles (CT or TT); 40 % had HCV/HIV-1 co-infection.
Treatment outcomes in genotype 4-infected subjects treated with elbasvir/grazoprevir for 12 weeks or elbasvir/grazoprevir with ribavirin for 16 weeks are presented in Table 11.
Table 11: SVR in genotype 4-infected subjects
¶
Baseline Characteristics
SVR
EBR with GZR
EBR with GZR + RBV
12 Weeks
16 Weeks
N=65
N=8
Overall SVR
94% (61/65)
100% (8/8)
Outcome for subjects without SVR
On-treatment virologic failure
*
0% (0/65)
0% (0/8)
Relapse
†
3% (2/65)
0% (0/8)
Other
‡
3% (2/65)
0% (0/8)
SVR by cirrhosis status
Non-cirrhotic
§
96% (51/53)
100% (4/4)
Cirrhotic
83% (10/12)
100% (4/4)
SVR by baseline HCV RNA
<=800,000 IU/mL
‡
93% (27/29)
100% (3/3)
>800,000 IU/mL
†
94% (34/36)
100% (5/5)
¶
Includes subjects from C-EDGE TN, C-EDGE COINFECTION, C-EDGE TE and C-SCAPE.
*
Includes subjects with virologic breakthrough.
†
Both relapsers had baseline HCV RNA >800,000 IU/mL
‡
Both subjects who failed to achieve SVR for reasons other than virologic failure had baseline HCV RNA <=800,000 IU/mL.
§
Includes 1 subject with cirrhosis status of “unknown” in C-SCAPE.
Clinical study in subjects with advanced chronic kidney disease with genotype 1 CHC infection
In the C-SURFER study, overall SVR was achieved in 94 % (115/122) of subjects receiving EBR + GZR for 12 weeks.
Paediatric population
The efficacy of ZEPATIER was evaluated in an open-label clinical study in 22 paediatric subjects 12 years to less than 18 years of age who received ZEPATIER for 12 weeks. HCV GT1a infected subjects with one or more baseline NS5A resistance-associated substitutions were excluded from study participation.
In this study, treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced subjects 12 years to less than 18 years of age with genotype 1 or 4 CHC, without cirrhosis, were treated with ZEPATIER for 12 weeks. The median age was 13.5 years (range: 12 to 17); 50 % were female; 95 % were White; the weight range was 28.1 kg to 96.5 kg; 95.5 % had genotype 1 and 4.5 % had genotype 4; 63.6 % were treatment-naïve, 36.4 % were treatment-experienced; 45.5 % had baseline HCV RNA levels greater than 800,000 IU/mL. The overall SVR12 rate was 100 % (22/22). The safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy observed in this study were comparable to those observed in adults.
⚠️ Warnings
Any unused medicinal product or waste material should be disposed of in accordance with local requirements.