This information is for educational purposes only. It is not intended as medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Dabigatran Etexilate Accord — Description, Dosage, Side Effects | PillsCard
Rx
Dabigatran Etexilate Accord
75 mg, Kapsułki twarde
INN: Dabigatranum etexilatum
Data updated: 2026-04-13
Available in:
🇨🇿🇩🇪🇬🇧🇫🇷🇵🇱🇸🇰🇺🇦
Form
Kapsułki twarde
Dosage
75 mg
Route
doustna
Storage
—
About This Product
User Reviews
Reviews reflect personal experiences and are not medical advice. Always consult your doctor.
Manufacturer
Accord Healthcare S.L.U. (Holandia)
Composition
Dabigatranum etexilatum mesilatum 75 mg
ATC Code
B01AE07
Source
URPL
Pharmacotherapeutic group: antithrombotic agents, direct thrombin inhibitors, ATC code: B01AE07.
Mechanism of action
Dabigatran etexilate is a small-molecule prodrug that exhibits no pharmacological activity. After oral administration, dabigatran etexilate is rapidly absorbed and converted to dabigatran in plasma and the liver by esterase-catalysed hydrolysis. Dabigatran is a potent, competitive, reversible, direct thrombin inhibitor and is the principal active moiety in plasma.
Because thrombin (a serine protease) catalyses the conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin in the coagulation cascade, its inhibition prevents thrombus formation. Dabigatran inhibits free thrombin, fibrin-bound thrombin and thrombin-induced platelet aggregation.
Pharmacodynamic effects
In in vivo and ex vivo animal studies, the antithrombotic efficacy and anticoagulant activity of dabigatran following intravenous administration, and of dabigatran etexilate following oral administration, were demonstrated in various animal models of thrombosis.
Phase II studies have established a clear correlation between plasma dabigatran concentrations and the magnitude of the anticoagulant effect. Dabigatran prolongs thrombin time (TT), ECT and aPTT.
The calibrated quantitative diluted thrombin time (dTT) assay provides an estimate of plasma dabigatran concentration that can be compared with expected plasma dabigatran concentrations. When the plasma dabigatran concentration measured by the calibrated dTT assay is at or below the limit of quantification, an additional coagulation assay such as TT, ECT or aPTT should be considered.
The ECT provides a direct measure of the activity of direct thrombin inhibitors.
The aPTT assay is widely available and provides an approximate indication of the intensity of anticoagulation achieved with dabigatran. However, the aPTT has limited sensitivity and is unsuitable for precise quantification of the anticoagulant effect, particularly at high plasma dabigatran concentrations. Although elevated aPTT values must be interpreted with caution, a high aPTT value indicates that the patient is anticoagulated.
In general, these measures of anticoagulant activity may be assumed to reflect dabigatran levels and to provide guidance for assessing bleeding risk; that is, exceeding the 90th percentile of the dabigatran trough concentration or of a coagulation assay such as aPTT measured at trough (for aPTT thresholds, see section 4.4, Table 6) is considered to be associated with an increased risk of bleeding.
Primary prevention of VTE in orthopaedic surgery
The geometric mean steady-state peak plasma concentrations of dabigatran (after day 3), measured approximately 2 hours after administration of a 220 mg dose of dabigatran etexilate, were 70.8 ng/mL, with a range of 35.2-162 ng/mL (25th-75th percentile). The geometric mean trough dabigatran concentration measured at the end of the dosing interval (i.e. 24 hours after the 220 mg dose) was on average 22.0 ng/mL, with a range of 13.0-35.7 ng/mL (25th-75th percentile).
In a study conducted exclusively in patients with moderate renal impairment (creatinine clearance, CrCL 30-50 mL/min) treated with dabigatran etexilate 150 mg once daily, the geometric mean trough dabigatran concentration measured at the end of the dosing interval was on average 47.5 ng/mL, with a range of 29.6-72.2 ng/mL (25th-75th percentile).
In patients treated with dabigatran etexilate 220 mg once daily for VTE prevention after hip or knee replacement, the 90th percentile of plasma dabigatran concentrations measured at trough (20-28 hours after the previous dose) was 67 ng/mL (see section 4.9).
The 90th percentile of aPTT at trough (20-28 hours after the previous dose) was 51 seconds, representing 1.3 times the upper limit of the normal range.
ECT was not measured in patients receiving dabigatran etexilate 220 mg once daily for VTE prevention after hip or knee replacement.
Prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in adult patients with NVAF and one or more risk factors (SPAF)
The geometric mean steady-state peak plasma concentrations of dabigatran, measured approximately 2 hours after administration of a 150 mg twice-daily dose of dabigatran etexilate, were 175 ng/mL, with a range of 117-275 ng/mL (25th-75th percentile). The geometric mean trough dabigatran concentration measured at the morning trough at the end of the dosing interval (i.e. 12 hours after the 150 mg evening dose) was on average 91.0 ng/mL, with a range of 61.0-143 ng/mL (25th-75th percentile).
In NVAF patients treated with dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism:
the 90th percentile of plasma dabigatran concentrations at trough (10-16 hours after the previous dose) was approximately 200 ng/mL;
ECT at trough (10-16 hours after the previous dose) increased to approximately three times the upper limit of the normal range, corresponding to the observed 90th percentile of ECT prolongation of 103 seconds;
an aPTT ratio greater than two times the upper limit of the normal range (aPTT prolongation to about 80 seconds) at trough (10-16 hours after the previous dose) corresponded to the 90th percentile of observations.
Treatment of DVT and PE and prevention of recurrent DVT and PE in adults (DVT/PE)
In patients treated for DVT and PE with dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily, the geometric mean trough dabigatran concentration measured 10-16 hours after dosing at the end of the dosing interval (i.e. 12 hours after the 150 mg evening dose) was 59.7 ng/mL, with a range of 38.6-94.5 ng/mL (25th-75th percentile). For the treatment of DVT and PE with dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily:
the 90th percentile of plasma dabigatran concentrations at trough (10-16 hours after the previous dose) was approximately 200 ng/mL;
ECT at trough (10-16 hours after the previous dose) increased approximately 2.3-fold relative to baseline, corresponding to the observed 90th percentile of ECT prolongation of 74 seconds;
the 90th percentile of aPTT at trough (10-16 hours after the previous dose) was 62 seconds, representing 1.8-fold the baseline value.
No pharmacokinetic data are available for patients treated for the prevention of recurrent DVT and PE with dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily.
Clinical efficacy and safety
Ethnic origin
No clinically relevant ethnic differences were observed between Caucasian, African-American, Hispanic, Japanese or Chinese patients.
Clinical trials in VTE prevention after major joint replacement surgery
In two large, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group dose-confirmation trials, patients undergoing elective major orthopaedic surgery (knee replacement in one trial and hip replacement in the other) received dabigatran etexilate 75 mg or 110 mg within 1-4 hours after surgery, followed by 150 mg or 220 mg once daily once haemostasis was secured, or enoxaparin 40 mg the day before surgery and once daily thereafter.
Treatment lasted 6-10 days in the RE-MODEL trial (knee replacement) and 28-35 days in the RE-NOVATE trial (hip replacement). The total numbers of patients treated were 2,076 (knee) and 3,494 (hip), respectively.
The primary endpoint in both studies was a composite of total VTE (including PE, proximal and distal DVT, symptomatic or asymptomatic, detected by routine venography) and all-cause mortality. The secondary endpoint, considered more clinically relevant, was a composite of major venous thromboembolism (including pulmonary embolism and proximal deep vein thrombosis, symptomatic or asymptomatic, detected by routine venography) and VTE-related mortality.
Both studies showed that the antithrombotic effect of dabigatran etexilate 220 mg and 150 mg was statistically non-inferior to that of enoxaparin in terms of total VTE and all-cause mortality. The point estimate for major VTE and VTE-related mortality with the 150 mg dose was slightly worse than with enoxaparin (Table 19). Better results were observed with the 220 mg dose, where the point estimate for major VTE was slightly better than with enoxaparin (Table 19).
The clinical studies were conducted in a patient population with a mean age > 65 years.
In phase 3 clinical trials, no differences between men and women were observed with respect to efficacy and safety data.
In the RE-MODEL and RE-NOVATE study population (5,539 treated patients), 51% had concomitant hypertension, 9% had concomitant diabetes, 9% had concomitant coronary artery disease, and 20% had a history of venous insufficiency. None of these conditions was observed to influence the effect of dabigatran on VTE prevention or on bleeding rates.
Data on the major VTE and VTE-related mortality endpoint were homogeneous with respect to the primary efficacy endpoint and are presented in Table 19.
Data on the total VTE and all-cause mortality endpoint are presented in Table 20.
Data on the adjudicated major bleeding endpoint are presented in Table 21 below.
Table 19: Analysis of major VTE and VTE-related mortality during the treatment period in the RE-MODEL and RE-NOVATE orthopaedic surgery trials
Trial
Dabigatran etexilate 220 mg once daily
Dabigatran etexilate 150 mg once daily
Enoxaparin 40 mg
RE-NOVATE (hip)
n
909
888
917
Incidence (%)
28 (3.1)
38 (4.3)
36 (3.9)
Hazard ratio vs. enoxaparin
0.78
1.09
95% confidence interval
0.48; 1.27
0.70; 1.70
RE-MODEL (knee)
n
506
527
511
Incidence (%)
13 (2.6)
20 (3.8)
18 (3.5)
Hazard ratio vs. enoxaparin
0.73
1.08
95% confidence interval
0.36; 1.47
0.58; 2.01
Table 20: Analysis of total VTE and all-cause mortality during the treatment period in the RE-MODEL and RE-NOVATE orthopaedic surgery trials
Trial
Dabigatran etexilate 220 mg once daily
Dabigatran etexilate 150 mg once daily
Enoxaparin 40 mg
RE-NOVATE (hip)
n
880
874
897
Incidence (%)
53 (6.0)
75 (8.6)
60 (6.7)
Hazard ratio vs. enoxaparin
0.9
1.28
95% confidence interval
(0.63; 1.29)
(0.93; 1.78)
RE-MODEL (knee)
n
503
526
512
Incidence (%)
183 (36.4)
213 (40.5)
193 (37.7)
Hazard ratio vs. enoxaparin
0.97
1.07
95% confidence interval
(0.82; 1.13)
(0.92; 1.25)
Table 21: Major bleeding events by treatment in the RE-MODEL and RE-NOVATE trials
Trial
Dabigatran etexilate 220 mg once daily
Dabigatran etexilate 150 mg once daily
Enoxaparin 40 mg
RE-NOVATE (hip)
Number of patients treated (n)
1,146
1,163
1,154
Number of MBE (%)
23 (2.0)
15 (1.3)
18 (1.6)
RE-MODEL (knee)
Number of patients treated (n)
679
703
694
Number of MBE (%)
10 (1.5)
9 (1.3)
9 (1.3)
Prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in adult patients with NVAF and one or more risk factors
Clinical evidence of the efficacy of dabigatran etexilate is derived from the RE-LY trial (Randomised Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapy), a multicentre, international, randomised, parallel-group study comparing two doses of dabigatran etexilate (110 mg and 150 mg twice daily) administered in a blinded manner with open-label warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation at moderate to high risk of stroke and systemic embolism. The primary objective of the trial was to demonstrate whether dabigatran etexilate was non-inferior to warfarin in reducing the composite endpoint of stroke and systemic embolism. Statistical superiority was also analysed.
A total of 18,113 patients with a mean age of 71.5 years and a mean CHADS2 score of 2.1 were randomised in the RE-LY trial. The patient population was 64% male, 70% Caucasian and 16% Asian. In patients randomised to warfarin, the mean percentage of time in the therapeutic range (TTR) (INR 2-3) was 64.4% (median TTR 67%).
The RE-LY trial showed that dabigatran etexilate 110 mg twice daily was non-inferior to warfarin in the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation, with a reduced risk of intracranial bleeding, total bleeding and major bleeding. The 150 mg twice-daily dose significantly reduced the risk of ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke, vascular death, intracranial bleeding and total bleeding compared with warfarin. The rate of major bleeding with this dose was comparable to warfarin. The rate of myocardial infarction was modestly increased with dabigatran etexilate 110 mg twice daily (hazard ratio 1.29; p = 0.0929) and dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily (hazard ratio 1.27; p = 0.1240) compared with warfarin. With improved INR monitoring, the observed benefits of dabigatran etexilate over warfarin are reduced.
Tables 22-24 present detailed key results in the overall population.
Table 22: Analysis of first occurrence of stroke or systemic embolism (primary endpoint) during the RE-LY observation period
Dabigatran etexilate 110 mg twice daily
Dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily
Warfarin
Subjects randomised
6,015
6,076
6,022
Stroke and/or systemic embolism
Incidence (%)
183 (1.54)
135 (1.12)
203 (1.72)
Hazard ratio vs. warfarin (95% confidence interval)
0.89 (0.73; 1.09)
0.65 (0.52; 0.81)
p-value for superiority
p = 0.2721
p = 0.0001
% refers to annual event rate
Table 23: Analysis of first occurrence of ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke during the RE-LY observation period
Dabigatran etexilate 110 mg twice daily
Dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily
Warfarin
Subjects randomised
6,015
6,076
6,022
Stroke
Incidence (%)
171 (1.44)
123 (1.02)
187 (1.59)
Hazard ratio vs. warfarin (95% confidence interval)
0.91 (0.74; 1.12)
0.64 (0.51; 0.81)
p-value
0.3553
0.0001
Systemic embolism
Incidence (%)
15 (0.13)
13 (0.11)
21 (0.18)
Hazard ratio vs. warfarin (95% confidence interval)
0.71 (0.37; 1.38)
0.61 (0.30; 1.21)
p-value
0.3099
0.1582
Ischaemic stroke
Incidence (%)
152 (1.28)
104 (0.86)
134 (1.14)
Hazard ratio vs. warfarin (95% confidence interval)
1.13 (0.89; 1.42)
0.76 (0.59; 0.98)
p-value
0.3138
0.0351
Haemorrhagic stroke
Incidence (%)
14 (0.12)
12 (0.10)
45 (0.38)
Hazard ratio vs. warfarin (95% confidence interval)
0.31 (0.17; 0.56)
0.26 (0.14; 0.49)
p-value
0.0001
< 0.0001
% refers to annual event rate
Table 24: Analysis of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular survival during the RE-LY observation period
Dabigatran etexilate 110 mg twice daily
Dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily
Warfarin
Subjects randomised
6,015
6,076
6,022
All-cause mortality
Incidence (%)
446 (3.75)
438 (3.64)
487 (4.13)
Hazard ratio vs. warfarin (95% confidence interval)
0.91 (0.80; 1.03)
0.88 (0.77; 1.00)
p-value
0.1308
0.0517
Vascular mortality
Incidence (%)
289 (2.43)
274 (2.28)
317 (2.69)
Hazard ratio vs. warfarin (95% confidence interval)
0.90 (0.77; 1.06)
0.85 (0.72; 0.99)
p-value
0.2081
0.0430
% refers to annual event rate
Tables 25-26 present results for the primary efficacy and safety endpoints in the relevant subpopulations.
For the primary endpoint of stroke and systemic embolism, no subgroups (e.g. age, body weight, sex, renal function, ethnicity, etc.) were identified with a hazard ratio differing from that for the overall population versus warfarin.
Table 25: Hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval for stroke/systemic embolism by subgroup
Endpoint
Dabigatran etexilate 110 mg twice daily vs. warfarin
Dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily vs. warfarin
Age (years)
< 65
1.10 (0.64; 1.87)
0.51 (0.26; 0.98)
65 ≤ and < 75
0.86 (0.62; 1.19)
0.67 (0.47; 0.95)
≥ 75
0.88 (0.66; 1.17)
0.68 (0.50; 0.92)
≥ 80
0.68 (0.44; 1.05)
0.67 (0.44; 1.02)
CrCL (mL/min)
30 ≤ and < 50
0.89 (0.61; 1.31)
0.48 (0.31; 0.76)
50 ≤ and < 80
0.91 (0.68; 1.20)
0.65 (0.47; 0.88)
≥ 80
0.81 (0.51; 1.28)
0.69 (0.43; 1.12)
For major bleeding, the primary safety endpoint, there was an interaction between treatment effect and age. The relative risk of bleeding with dabigatran compared with warfarin increased with age. The relative risk was highest in patients aged 75 years and older. Concomitant treatment with antiplatelet agents, ASA or clopidogrel approximately doubles the rate of major bleeding events with both dabigatran etexilate and warfarin. There was no significant treatment-effect interaction for subgroups defined by renal function or CHADS2 score.
Table 26: Hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval for major bleeding by subgroup
Endpoint
Dabigatran etexilate 110 mg twice daily vs. warfarin
Dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily vs. warfarin
Age (years)
< 65
0.32 (0.18; 0.57)
0.35 (0.20; 0.61)
65 ≤ and < 75
0.71 (0.56; 0.89)
0.82 (0.66; 1.03)
≥ 75
1.01 (0.84; 1.23)
1.19 (0.99; 1.43)
≥ 80
1.14 (0.86; 1.51)
1.35 (1.03; 1.76)
CrCL (mL/min)
30 ≤ and < 50
1.02 (0.79; 1.32)
0.94 (0.73; 1.22)
50 ≤ and < 80
0.75 (0.61; 0.92)
0.90 (0.74; 1.09)
≥ 80
0.59 (0.43; 0.82)
0.87 (0.65; 1.17)
ASA use
0.84 (0.69; 1.03)
0.97 (0.79; 1.18)
Clopidogrel use
0.89 (0.55; 1.45)
0.92 (0.57; 1.48)
RELY-ABLE (long-term multicentre extension of dabigatran treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation who completed the RE-LY trial)
The RE-LY extension trial (RELY-ABLE) provided additional safety information for the cohort of patients who continued on the same dose of dabigatran etexilate as in the RE-LY trial. Patients were eligible for the RELY-ABLE trial if they had not permanently discontinued the trial medication at the time of their final visit in the RE-LY trial. Enrolled patients continued to receive the same blinded dose of dabigatran etexilate to which they had been randomised in RE-LY for a follow-up of up to 43 months after the end of RE-LY (overall mean follow-up across RE-LY and RELY-ABLE was 4.5 years). A total of 5,897 patients were enrolled, representing 49% of patients originally randomised to dabigatran etexilate in RE-LY and 86% of patients eligible for RELY-ABLE.
During an additional 2.5 years of treatment in the RELY-ABLE trial, with a maximum exposure exceeding 6 years (total exposure across RE-LY and RELY-ABLE), the long-term safety profile of dabigatran etexilate was confirmed for both 110 mg twice-daily and 150 mg twice-daily doses. No new safety findings were observed.
The rates of adjudicated events including major bleeding and other bleeding events were consistent with those observed in the RE-LY trial.
Data from non-interventional studies
In a non-interventional study (GLORIA-AF), data on the safety and efficacy of dabigatran etexilate were collected prospectively (in its second phase) in patients with newly diagnosed NVAF treated in routine clinical practice. The study enrolled 4,859 patients treated with dabigatran etexilate (55% on 150 mg twice daily, 43% on 110 mg twice daily, 2% on 75 mg twice daily). Patients were followed for 2 years. The mean CHADS2 score was 1.9 and the mean HAS-BLED score was 1.2. The mean on-treatment follow-up duration was 18.3 months.
Major bleeding occurred at a rate of 0.97 events per 100 patient-years. Life-threatening bleeding was reported at 0.46 events per 100 patient-years, intracranial bleeding at 0.17 events per 100 patient-years and gastrointestinal bleeding at 0.60 events per 100 patient-years. Stroke occurred at a rate of 0.65 events per 100 patient-years.
In addition, in a non-interventional study [Graham DJ et al., Circulation. 2015;131:157-164] conducted in the United States in more than 134,000 elderly patients with NVAF (contributing more than 37,500 patient-years of on-treatment follow-up), dabigatran etexilate (84% of patients on 150 mg twice daily, 16% on 75 mg twice daily) was associated, compared with warfarin, with a reduced risk of ischaemic stroke (hazard ratio 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.96), intracranial bleeding (hazard ratio 0.34; CI 0.26-0.46) and mortality (hazard ratio 0.86; CI 0.77-0.96), and an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (hazard ratio 1.28; CI 1.14-1.44). No difference was observed for major bleeding (hazard ratio 0.97; CI 0.88-1.07).
These real-world observations are consistent with the established safety and efficacy profile of dabigatran etexilate in this indication in the RE-LY trial.
Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stenting
A prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) phase IIIb clinical trial was conducted in 2,725 patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who had undergone PCI with stenting, to evaluate dual therapy with dabigatran etexilate (110 mg or 150 mg twice daily) plus clopidogrel or ticagrelor (a P2Y12 antagonist) compared with triple therapy of warfarin (titrated to INR 2.0-3.0), clopidogrel or ticagrelor and ASA (RE-DUAL PCI). Patients were randomised to dual therapy with dabigatran etexilate 110 mg twice daily, dual therapy with dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily, or triple therapy with warfarin. Elderly patients outside the United States (≥ 80 years of age in all countries; ≥ 70 years of age in Japan) were randomised to dual therapy with dabigatran etexilate 110 mg or to triple therapy with warfarin. The primary endpoint was a composite of ISTH-defined major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding.
The incidence of the primary endpoint was 15.4% (151 patients) in the dabigatran etexilate 110 mg dual-therapy group compared with 26.9% (264 patients) in the warfarin triple-therapy group (hazard ratio 0.52; 95% CI 0.42, 0.63; p < 0.0001 for non-inferiority and p < 0.0001 for superiority), and 20.2% (154 patients) in the dabigatran etexilate 150 mg dual-therapy group compared with 25.7% (196 patients) in the corresponding warfarin triple-therapy group (hazard ratio 0.72; 95% CI 0.58, 0.88; p < 0.0001 for non-inferiority and p = 0.002 for superiority). In a descriptive analysis, the rate of TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) major bleeding events was lower in both dabigatran etexilate dual-therapy groups than in the warfarin triple-therapy group: 14 events (1.4%) in the dabigatran etexilate 110 mg dual-therapy group compared with 37 events (3.8%) in the warfarin triple-therapy group (hazard ratio 0.37; 95% CI 0.20, 0.68; p = 0.002), and 16 events (2.1%) in the dabigatran etexilate 150 mg dual-therapy group compared with 30 events (3.9%) in the corresponding warfarin triple-therapy group (hazard ratio 0.51; 95% CI 0.28, 0.93; p = 0.03). In both dabigatran etexilate dual-therapy groups, intracranial bleeding rates were lower than in the corresponding warfarin triple-therapy group: 3 events (0.3%) in the dabigatran etexilate 110 mg dual-therapy group compared with 10 events (1.0%) in the warfarin triple-therapy group (hazard ratio 0.30; 95% CI 0.08, 1.07; p = 0.06), and 1 event (0.1%) in the dabigatran etexilate 150 mg dual-therapy group compared with 8 events (1.0%) in the corresponding warfarin triple-therapy group (hazard ratio 0.12; 95% CI 0.02, 0.98; p = 0.047). The incidence of the composite efficacy endpoint of death, thromboembolic events (myocardial infarction, stroke or systemic embolism) or unplanned revascularisation was non-inferior in the combined dabigatran etexilate dual-therapy groups compared with the warfarin triple-therapy group (13.7% vs. 13.4%, respectively; hazard ratio 1.04; 95% CI: 0.84, 1.29; p = 0.0047 for non-inferiority). For the individual components of the efficacy endpoints, no statistical differences were identified between the dabigatran etexilate dual-therapy groups and the warfarin triple-therapy group.
This study demonstrated that, in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing PCI with stenting, dual therapy with dabigatran etexilate plus a P2Y12 antagonist significantly reduced the risk of bleeding compared with warfarin triple therapy, while non-inferiority was established for the composite of thromboembolic events.
Treatment of DVT and PE in adults (DVT/PE treatment)
Efficacy and safety were evaluated in two multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, identical trials, RE-COVER and RE-COVER II. These trials compared dabigatran etexilate (150 mg twice daily) with warfarin (target INR 2.0-3.0) in patients with acute DVT and/or PE. The primary objective of these trials was to demonstrate that dabigatran etexilate was non-inferior to warfarin in reducing the incidence of the primary endpoint, a composite of recurrent symptomatic DVT and/or PE and associated deaths during the 6-month treatment period.
In the pooled RE-COVER and RE-COVER II analysis, a total of 5,153 patients were randomised and 5,107 were treated.
The duration of fixed-dose dabigatran treatment was 174.0 days, without coagulation monitoring. In patients randomised to warfarin, the median time in therapeutic range (INR 2.0 to 3.0) was 60.6%.
The trials demonstrated that treatment with dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily was non-inferior to warfarin (non-inferiority margins for RE-COVER and RE-COVER II: 3.6 for risk difference and 2.75 for hazard ratio).
Table 27: Analysis of primary and secondary efficacy endpoints (VTE comprising DVT and/or PE) for the pooled RE-COVER and RE-COVER II trials through the end of the post-treatment period
Dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily
Warfarin
Number of patients treated
2,553
2,554
Recurrent symptomatic VTE and VTE-related deaths
68 (2.7%)
62 (2.4%)
Hazard ratio vs. warfarin (95% confidence interval)
1.09 (0.77; 1.54)
Secondary efficacy endpoints
Recurrent symptomatic VTE and all-cause mortality
109 (4.3%)
104 (4.1%)
95% confidence interval
3.52; 5.13
3.34; 4.91
Symptomatic DVT
45 (1.8%)
39 (1.5%)
95% confidence interval
1.29; 2.35
1.09; 2.08
Symptomatic PE
27 (1.1%)
26 (1.0%)
95% confidence interval
0.70; 1.54
0.67; 1.49
VTE-related deaths
4 (0.2%)
3 (0.1%)
95% confidence interval
0.04; 0.40
0.02; 0.34
All-cause mortality
51 (2.0%)
52 (2.0%)
95% confidence interval
1.49; 2.62
1.52; 2.66
Prevention of recurrent DVT and PE in adults (DVT/PE prevention)
Two randomised, double-blind, parallel-group studies were conducted in patients previously treated with anticoagulant therapy. RE-MEDY, a warfarin-controlled study, enrolled patients already treated for 3 to 12 months who required further anticoagulant therapy, and RE-SONATE, a placebo-controlled study, enrolled patients already treated with vitamin K antagonists for 6 to 18 months.
The objective of the RE-MEDY trial was to compare the safety and efficacy of oral dabigatran etexilate (150 mg twice daily) with warfarin (target INR 2.0-3.0) in the long-term treatment and prevention of recurrent symptomatic DVT and/or PE. A total of 2,866 patients were randomised and 2,856 patients were treated. The duration of dabigatran etexilate treatment ranged from 6 to 36 months (median 534.0 days). In patients randomised to warfarin, the median time in therapeutic range (INR 2.0-3.0) was 64.9%.
The RE-MEDY trial demonstrated that treatment with dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily was non-inferior to warfarin (non-inferiority margins: 2.85 for hazard ratio and 2.8 for risk difference).
Table 28: Analysis of primary and secondary efficacy endpoints (VTE comprising DVT and/or PE) for the RE-MEDY trial through the end of the post-treatment period
Dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily
Warfarin
Number of patients treated
1,430
1,426
Recurrent symptomatic VTE and VTE-related deaths
26 (1.8%)
18 (1.3%)
Hazard ratio vs. warfarin (95% confidence interval)
1.44 (0.78; 2.64)
Non-inferiority margin
2.85
Patients with an event at 18 months
22
17
Cumulative risk at 18 months (%)
1.7
1.4
Risk difference vs. warfarin (%)
0.4
95% confidence interval
Non-inferiority margin
2.8
Secondary efficacy endpoints
Recurrent symptomatic VTE and all-cause mortality
42 (2.9%)
36 (2.5%)
95% confidence interval
2.12; 3.95
1.77; 3.48
Symptomatic DVT
17 (1.2%)
13 (0.9%)
95% confidence interval
0.69; 1.90
0.49; 1.55
Symptomatic PE
10 (0.7%)
5 (0.4%)
95% confidence interval
0.34; 1.28
0.11; 0.82
VTE-related deaths
1 (0.1%)
1 (0.1%)
95% confidence interval
0.00; 0.39
0.00; 0.39
All-cause mortality
17 (1.2%)
19 (1.3%)
95% confidence interval
0.69; 1.90
0.80; 2.07
The objective of the RE-SONATE trial was to evaluate the superiority of dabigatran etexilate over placebo in the prevention of recurrent symptomatic DVT and/or PE in patients who had completed 6 to 18 months of treatment with a VKA. The intended treatment was 6 months of dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily without monitoring.
The RE-SONATE trial demonstrated that dabigatran etexilate was superior to placebo in preventing recurrent symptomatic DVT/PE events, including unexplained deaths, with a reduction in risk from 5.6% to 0.4% (a 92% relative risk reduction based on hazard ratio) during the treatment period (p < 0.0001). All secondary and sensitivity analyses of the primary endpoint and all secondary endpoints demonstrated the superiority of dabigatran etexilate over placebo.
The trial included a 12-month observational follow-up after the end of treatment. After discontinuation of the study medication, the effect persisted through the end of follow-up, indicating that the initial therapeutic effect of dabigatran etexilate was maintained. No rebound effect was observed. At the end of the follow-up period, VTE events occurred in 6.9% of patients treated with dabigatran etexilate compared with 10.7% in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0.61 [95% CI 0.42; 0.88], p = 0.0082).
Table 29: Analysis of primary and secondary efficacy endpoints (VTE comprising DVT and/or PE) for the RE-SONATE trial through the end of the post-treatment period
Dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily
Placebo
Number of patients treated
681
662
Recurrent symptomatic VTE and VTE-related deaths
3 (0.4%)
37 (5.6%)
Hazard ratio vs. placebo (95% confidence interval)
0.08 (0.02; 0.25)
p-value for superiority
< 0.0001
Secondary efficacy endpoints
Recurrent symptomatic VTE and all-cause mortality
3 (0.4%)
37 (5.6%)
95% confidence interval
0.09; 1.28
3.97; 7.62
Symptomatic DVT
2 (0.3%)
23 (3.5%)
95% confidence interval
0.04; 1.06
2.21; 5.17
Symptomatic PE
1 (0.1%)
14 (2.1%)
95% confidence interval
0.00; 0.82
1.16; 3.52
VTE-related deaths
0 (0)
0 (0)
95% confidence interval
0.00; 0.54
0.00; 0.56
Unexplained deaths
0 (0)
2 (0.3%)
95% confidence interval
0.00; 0.54
0.04; 1.09
All-cause mortality
0 (0)
2 (0.3%)
95% confidence interval
0.00; 0.54
0.04; 1.09
Clinical trials of thromboembolism prevention in patients with prosthetic heart valves
A phase II trial evaluated dabigatran etexilate and warfarin in a total of 252 patients following surgical mechanical heart valve replacement, in the early postoperative period (i.e. dosing was initiated during post-surgical hospitalisation) and in patients who had received a mechanical heart valve replacement more than three months earlier. More thromboembolic events (predominantly stroke and symptomatic/asymptomatic prosthetic valve thrombosis) and more bleeding events were observed with dabigatran etexilate than with warfarin. In patients in the early postoperative phase, major bleeding presented predominantly as haemorrhagic pericardial effusions, mainly in patients in whom dabigatran etexilate was initiated early (i.e. on day 3) following surgical heart valve replacement (see section 4.3).
Paediatric population
Clinical trials in VTE prevention after major joint replacement surgery
Prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in adult patients with NVAF and one or more risk factors
The European Medicines Agency has waived the obligation to submit the results of studies with the reference product containing dabigatran etexilate in all subsets of the paediatric population in the indications of primary VTE prevention in patients undergoing elective total hip or knee replacement and prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with NVAF (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).
Treatment of VTE and prevention of recurrent VTE in paediatric patients
The DIVERSITY trial was conducted to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate compared with standard of care (SOC) in the treatment of VTE in paediatric patients from birth to less than 18 years of age. The trial was designed as an open-label, randomised, parallel-group non-inferiority study. Enrolled patients were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to either dabigatran etexilate (doses adjusted by age and body weight) in an age-appropriate formulation (capsules, coated granules or oral solution) or to SOC consisting of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH), vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or fondaparinux (1 patient aged 12 years). The primary endpoint was a composite of the number of patients with complete thrombus resolution, absence of recurrent VTE and absence of VTE-related mortality. Exclusion criteria included active meningitis, encephalitis and intracranial abscess.
A total of 267 patients were randomised. Of these, 176 patients received dabigatran etexilate and 90 patients received SOC (1 randomised patient was not treated). 168 patients were aged 12 to less than 18 years, 64 patients were aged 2 to less than 12 years, and 35 patients were younger than 2 years.
Of the 267 randomised patients, 81 patients (45.8%) in the dabigatran etexilate group and 38 patients (42.2%) in the SOC group met the criteria for the composite endpoint (complete thrombus resolution, absence of recurrent VTE and absence of VTE-related mortality). The corresponding difference in event rates demonstrated non-inferiority of dabigatran etexilate to SOC. Consistent results were also observed overall across subgroups: no significant differences in treatment effect were seen in subgroups defined by age, sex, region or the presence of certain risk factors. In the 3 different age groups, the proportions of patients meeting the primary efficacy endpoint in the dabigatran etexilate and SOC groups were 13/22 (59.1%) versus 7/13 (53.8%) in patients from birth to less than 2 years, 21/43 (48.8%) versus 12/21 (57.1%) in patients aged 2 to less than 12 years, and 47/112 (42.0%) versus 19/56 (33.9%) in patients aged 12 to less than 18 years.
Adjudicated major bleeding was reported in 4 patients (2.3%) in the dabigatran etexilate group and 2 patients (2.2%) in the SOC group. There was no statistically significant difference in time to first major bleeding event. Thirty-eight patients (21.6%) in the dabigatran etexilate arm and 22 patients (24.4%) in the SOC arm had any adjudicated bleeding events, most of which were classified as minor. The composite endpoint of adjudicated major bleeding events (MBE) or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding (during treatment) was reported in 6 patients (3.4%) in the dabigatran etexilate group and 3 patients (3.3%) in the SOC group.
A prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicentre phase III cohort study (1160.108) was conducted to evaluate the safety of dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of recurrent VTE in paediatric patients from birth to less than 18 years of age. Patients eligible for enrolment were those who required additional anticoagulant therapy due to the presence of clinical risk factors after completion of initial therapy for confirmed VTE (for at least 3 months) or after completion of the DIVERSITY trial. Patients in the trial received doses of dabigatran etexilate adjusted by age and body weight in an age-appropriate formulation (capsules, coated granules or oral solution) until resolution of clinical risk factors or for a maximum of 12 months. The primary endpoints of the trial included recurrent VTE, major and minor bleeding events, and mortality (overall and related to thrombotic or thromboembolic events) at 6 and 12 months. Event outcomes were assessed by an independent blinded adjudication committee.
A total of 214 patients were enrolled in the trial, including 162 patients in age group 1 (12 to less than 18 years), 43 patients in age group 2 (2 to less than 12 years) and 9 patients in age group 3 (birth to less than 2 years). During the treatment period, recurrent VTE was confirmed in 3 patients (1.4%) within the first 12 months after treatment initiation. Confirmed bleeding events during the treatment period were reported in the first 12 months in 48 patients (22.5%). Most bleeding events were minor. Adjudicated major bleeding events occurred in 3 patients (1.4%) within the first 12 months. Adjudicated CRNM bleeding was reported in 3 patients (1.4%) within the first 12 months. No deaths occurred during treatment. During the treatment period, 3 patients (1.4%) developed post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) or experienced worsening of PTS within the first 12 months.
⚠️ Warnings
Risk of bleeding
Dabigatran etexilate should be used with caution in conditions associated with an increased risk of bleeding or with concomitant administration of medicinal products that affect haemostasis through inhibition of platelet aggregation. Bleeding may occur at any site during therapy. An unexplained drop in haemoglobin and/or haematocrit or in blood pressure should prompt a search for a bleeding source.
In situations of life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding in adult patients, where rapid reversal of the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran is required, the specific reversal agent idarucizumab is available. The efficacy and safety of idarucizumab have not been established in paediatric patients. Dabigatran can be removed by haemodialysis. Other options for adult patients are fresh whole blood or fresh frozen plasma, coagulation factor concentrates (activated or non-activated), recombinant factor VIIa or platelet concentrates (see also section 4.9).
In clinical trials, dabigatran etexilate was associated with a higher incidence of major gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. This increased risk was observed in elderly patients (≥ 75 years) on the 150 mg twice-daily regimen. Additional risk factors (see also Table 5) include concomitant use of platelet aggregation inhibitors such as clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), as well as the presence of oesophagitis, gastritis or gastro-oesophageal reflux.
Risk factors
Table 5 summarises the factors that may increase the risk of bleeding.
Table 5: Factors that may increase the risk of bleeding
Risk factor
Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic factors
Age ≥ 75 years
Factors increasing plasma dabigatran levels
Major:
Minor:
Pharmacodynamic interactions (see section 4.5)
Diseases/procedures associated with an increased risk of bleeding
moderate renal impairment in adult patients (CrCL 30-50 mL/min)
strong P-gp inhibitors (see section 4.5)
concomitant administration of weak to moderate P-gp inhibitors (e.g. amiodarone, verapamil, quinidine and ticagrelor; see section 4.5)
low body weight (< 50 kg) in adult patients
ASA and other platelet aggregation inhibitors such as clopidogrel
NSAIDs
SSRIs or SNRIs
other medicinal products that may affect haemostasis
congenital or acquired coagulation disorders
thrombocytopenia or platelet function disorders
recent biopsy, major trauma
bacterial endocarditis
oesophagitis, gastritis or gastro-oesophageal reflux
Limited data are available in adult patients with body weight < 50 kg (see section 5.2).
Concomitant use of dabigatran etexilate with P-gp inhibitors has not been studied in paediatric patients but may increase the risk of bleeding (see section 4.5).
Precautions and management of bleeding risk
For the management of bleeding complications, see also section 4.9.
Benefit-risk assessment
Lesions, conditions, procedures and/or pharmacological treatments (such as NSAIDs, antiplatelet agents, SSRIs and SNRIs; see section 4.5) that significantly increase the risk of major bleeding require careful evaluation of the benefit-risk balance. Dabigatran etexilate should be administered only if the benefit outweighs the risk of bleeding.
Limited clinical data are available in paediatric patients with risk factors, including those with active meningitis, encephalitis and intracranial abscess (see section 5.1). In these patients, dabigatran etexilate should be administered only if the anticipated benefit outweighs the risk of bleeding.
Close clinical surveillance
During the treatment phase, close monitoring for signs of bleeding or anaemia is recommended, particularly when risk factors are combined (see Table 5 above). Particular caution is required when dabigatran etexilate is co-administered with verapamil, amiodarone, quinidine or clarithromycin (P-gp inhibitors), and especially in the event of bleeding, particularly in patients with reduced renal function (see section 4.5).
In patients receiving concomitant NSAID therapy, close monitoring for signs of bleeding is recommended (see section 4.5).
Discontinuation of dabigatran etexilate
Patients who develop acute renal failure must discontinue dabigatran etexilate (see also section 4.3).
When severe bleeding occurs, treatment must be discontinued, the source of bleeding must be investigated and, in adult patients, administration of the specific reversal agent (idarucizumab) may be considered. The efficacy and safety of idarucizumab have not been established in paediatric patients. Dabigatran can be removed by haemodialysis.
Use of proton pump inhibitors
For the prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding, administration of a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) may be considered. In paediatric patients, treatment with proton pump inhibitors should follow the local recommendations set out in the product information.
Laboratory coagulation parameters
Although routine monitoring of anticoagulant effect is generally not necessary with this medicinal product, measurement of the level of dabigatran-related anticoagulation may be useful for detecting excessive dabigatran exposure when additional risk factors are present.
The diluted thrombin time (dTT), ecarin clotting time (ECT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) may provide useful information, but the results must be interpreted with caution because of inter-assay variability (see section 5.1).
The international normalised ratio (INR) test is unreliable in patients treated with dabigatran etexilate, and false-positive INR elevations have been reported. Therefore, the INR test should not be performed.
Table 6 shows the trough coagulation test thresholds in adult patients that may be associated with an increased risk of bleeding. Corresponding thresholds in paediatric patients are not known (see section 5.1).
Table 6: Trough coagulation test thresholds in adult patients that may be associated with an increased risk of bleeding
Test (trough value)
Indication
Primary VTE prevention in orthopaedic surgery
SPAF and DVT/PE
dTT (ng/mL)
> 67
> 200
ECT (× upper limit of the normal range)
data not available
> 3
aPTT (× upper limit of the normal range)
> 1.3
> 2
INR
should not be performed
should not be performed
Use of fibrinolytics in the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke
The use of fibrinolytics for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke may be considered in patients whose dTT, ECT or aPTT values do not exceed the upper limit of the normal range (ULN) of local reference values.
Surgical and other interventions
Patients receiving dabigatran etexilate who undergo surgical or other invasive procedures are at increased risk of bleeding. For this reason, temporary discontinuation of dabigatran etexilate before surgical procedures may be necessary.
Treatment with dabigatran etexilate need not be interrupted for cardioversion. No data are available for treatment with dabigatran etexilate 110 mg twice daily in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (see section 4.2).
If treatment is temporarily interrupted for a procedure, caution is required and monitoring of the anticoagulant effect is advised. Dabigatran clearance may be prolonged in patients with renal insufficiency (see section 5.1) to help determine whether haemostasis is still impaired.
Emergency surgical or urgent procedures
Administration of dabigatran etexilate must be temporarily discontinued. If rapid reversal of the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran is required, the specific reversal agent for dabigatran (idarucizumab) is available for adult patients. The efficacy and safety of idarucizumab have not been established in paediatric patients. Dabigatran can be removed by haemodialysis.
Reversal of the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran exposes patients to the thrombotic risk inherent in their underlying disease. Treatment with dabigatran etexilate may be reinitiated 24 hours after administration of idarucizumab if the patient is clinically stable and adequate haemostasis has been achieved.
Subacute surgery/procedures
Administration of dabigatran etexilate must be temporarily discontinued. Where possible, surgery or procedures should be deferred for at least 12 hours after the last dose. If surgery cannot be deferred, the risk of bleeding may be increased. This bleeding risk must be weighed against the urgency of the procedure.
Elective surgical procedures
Where possible, dabigatran etexilate should be discontinued at least 24 hours before a surgical or invasive procedure. In patients at higher risk of bleeding or undergoing major surgery that may require complete haemostasis, discontinuation of dabigatran etexilate 2-4 days before surgery should be considered.
Table 7 summarises the rules for treatment interruption before invasive or surgical procedures in adult patients.
Table 7: Rules for treatment interruption before invasive or surgical procedures in adult patients
Renal function (CrCL in mL/min)
Estimated half-life (in hours)
Dabigatran etexilate should be discontinued before elective procedure
High risk of bleeding or major surgery
Standard risk
≥ 80
~13
2 days before
24 hours before
≥ 50-< 80
~15
2-3 days before
1-2 days before
≥ 30-< 50
~18
4 days before
2-3 days before (> 48 hours)
The rules for treatment interruption before invasive or surgical procedures in paediatric patients are summarised in Table 8.
Table 8: Rules for treatment interruption before invasive or surgical procedures in paediatric patients
Renal function (eGFR in mL/min/1.73 m²)
Discontinuation of dabigatran before elective surgery
> 80
24 hours before
50-80
2 days before
< 50
These patients have not been studied (see section 4.3).
Spinal anaesthesia/epidural anaesthesia/lumbar puncture
Procedures such as spinal anaesthesia may require fully functional haemostasis.
The risk of developing a spinal or epidural haematoma may be increased in cases of traumatic or repeated puncture and with prolonged use of epidural catheters. After removal of the catheter, an interval of at least two hours is required before administration of the first dose of dabigatran etexilate. These patients must be frequently monitored for the development of neurological signs and symptoms of spinal or epidural haematoma.
Postoperative phase
Treatment with dabigatran etexilate should be reinitiated/initiated as soon as possible following an invasive procedure or surgery, once the clinical condition allows and adequate haemostasis has been achieved.
Patients at risk of bleeding or those at risk of excessive exposure, particularly patients with impaired renal function (see also Table 5), should be treated with caution (see section 5.1).
Patients at high risk of mortality from surgery and with intrinsic risk factors for thromboembolic events
Data on the efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate in these patients are limited; therefore, these patients must be treated with caution.
Surgery for hip fracture
No data are available for the use of dabigatran etexilate in patients undergoing surgery for hip fracture. For this reason, treatment is not recommended.
Hepatic impairment
Patients with liver enzyme elevations greater than two times the ULN were excluded from the main clinical trials. There is no treatment experience in this subpopulation, and therefore the use of dabigatran etexilate is not recommended in these patients. Hepatic impairment or liver disease expected to have any impact on survival is contraindicated (see section 4.3).
Interactions with P-gp inducers
Concomitant administration of dabigatran etexilate with P-gp inducers is expected to result in decreased plasma concentrations of dabigatran and should therefore be avoided (see section 5.2).
Patients with antiphospholipid syndrome
Direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including dabigatran etexilate, are not recommended for patients with a history of thrombosis who are diagnosed with antiphospholipid syndrome. In particular, in patients with triple positivity (lupus anticoagulant, anticardiolipin antibodies and anti-beta-2-glycoprotein I antibodies), DOAC treatment may be associated with an increased rate of recurrent thrombotic events compared with vitamin K antagonist therapy.
Myocardial infarction (MI)
In the phase III RE-LY trial (SPAF, see section 5.1), the overall incidence of MI was 0.82%/year with dabigatran etexilate 110 mg twice daily, 0.81%/year with dabigatran etexilate 150 mg twice daily and 0.64%/year with warfarin, representing an increase in relative risk of 29% and 27% for dabigatran compared with warfarin. Regardless of treatment, the highest absolute risk of MI was observed in the following subgroups, with similar relative risks: patients with a history of MI, patients aged 65 years or older with either diabetes or coronary artery disease, patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction below 40%, and patients with moderate renal impairment. A higher risk of MI was also observed in patients receiving concomitant ASA with clopidogrel or clopidogrel alone.
In three active-controlled phase III DVT/PE trials, a higher incidence of MI was reported in patients receiving dabigatran etexilate than in those receiving warfarin: 0.4% versus 0.2% in the short-term RE-COVER and RE-COVER II trials, and 0.8% versus 0.1% in the long-term RE-MEDY trial. The increase was statistically significant in this trial (p = 0.022).
In the RE-SONATE trial, which compared dabigatran etexilate with placebo, the incidence of MI was 0.1% in patients receiving dabigatran etexilate and 0.2% in patients receiving placebo.
Patients with active malignancy (DVT/PE, paediatric patients with VTE)
Efficacy and safety have not been established in patients with DVT/PE and active malignancy. In paediatric patients with active malignancy, only limited efficacy and safety data are available.
Paediatric population
In some very specific paediatric patients, e.g. those with small bowel disease in whom absorption may be impaired, parenteral anticoagulant therapy should be considered.
Information on excipients
This medicinal product contains less than 1 mmol (23 mg) of sodium per capsule, that is, it is essentially "sodium-free".