This information is for educational purposes only. It is not intended as medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional.
Rx
Evenity
90 mg/ml, Roztwór do wstrzykiwań we wstrzykiwaczu
INN: Romosozumabum
Data updated: 2026-04-13
Available in:
🇨🇿🇩🇪🇬🇧🇵🇱🇵🇹🇸🇰🇹🇷
Form
Roztwór do wstrzykiwań we wstrzykiwaczu
Dosage
90 mg/ml
Route
podskórna
Storage
—
About This Product
User Reviews
Reviews reflect personal experiences and are not medical advice. Always consult your doctor.
Manufacturer
UCB Pharma S.A. (Holandia)
Composition
Romosozumabum 90 mg/ml
ATC Code
M05BX06
Source
URPL
Pharmacotherapeutic group: Drugs for treatment of bone diseases, drugs affecting bone structure and mineralization, ATC code: M05BX06.
Mechanism of action
Romosozumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2) that binds and inhibits sclerostin, thereby increasing bone formation due to the activation of bone lining cells, increasing bone matrix production by osteoblasts, and recruitment of osteoprogenitor cells. Additionally, romosozumab results in changes to expression of osteoclast mediators, thereby decreasing bone resorption. Together, this dual effect of increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption results in rapid increases in trabecular and cortical bone mass, improvements in bone structure, and strength.
Pharmacodynamic effects
In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, romosozumab increased the bone formation marker procollagen Type 1 N terminal propeptide (P1NP) early in treatment, with a peak increase of approximately 145% relative to placebo 2 weeks after initiating treatment, followed by a return to placebo levels at month 9 and a decline to approximately 15% below placebo at month 12. Romosozumab decreased the bone resorption marker type-1 collagen C-telopeptide (CTX) with a maximal reduction of approximately 55% relative to placebo 2 weeks after initiating treatment. CTX levels remained below placebo and were approximately 25% below placebo at month 12.
After discontinuation of romosozumab therapy in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, P1NP levels returned to baseline within 12 months; CTX increased above baseline levels within 3 months and returned toward baseline levels by month 12, reflecting reversibility of effect. Upon retreatment with romosozumab (in a limited number of patients) after 12 months placebo treatment, the levels of increase in P1NP and decrease in CTX by romosozumab were similar to that observed during the initial treatment.
Clinical trial efficacy
Treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women
Efficacy and safety of romosozumab was assessed in two pivotal studies, an alendronate-controlled (ARCH) and a placebo-controlled study (FRAME).
Study 20110142 (ARCH)
The efficacy and safety of romosozumab in the treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women was evaluated in a multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, alendronate-controlled, superiority study of 4,093 postmenopausal women aged 55 to 90 years (mean age of 74.3 years) with previous fragility fractures.
Enrolled women had either a BMD (Bone Mineral Density) T-score at the total hip or femoral neck of ≤ −2.50, and either at least 1 moderate or severe vertebral fracture; or at least 2 mild vertebral fractures; or a BMD T-score at the total hip or femoral neck of ≤ -2.00, and either at least 2 moderate or severe vertebral fractures; or a fracture of the proximal femur that occurred within 3 to 24 months prior to randomization.
The mean baseline lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck BMD T-scores were -2.96, -2.80, and -2.90, respectively, 96.1% of women had a vertebral fracture at baseline, and 99.0% of women had a previous osteoporotic fracture. Women were randomized (1:1) to receive either monthly subcutaneous injections of romosozumab or oral weekly alendronate in a blinded fashion for 12 months. After the 12-month double blind study period, women in both arms transitioned to alendronate while remaining blinded to their initial treatment. The primary analysis was performed when all women had completed the month 24 study visit and clinical fracture events were confirmed for at least 330 women and occurred after a median follow-up time of approximately 33 months on study. Women received calcium and vitamin D supplementation daily.
The primary efficacy endpoints were the incidence of new vertebral fracture through month 24 and the incidence of clinical fracture (nonvertebral fracture and clinical vertebral fracture) at primary analysis.
Effect on new vertebral, clinical, nonvertebral, hip and major osteoporotic fractures
As shown in Table 1, romosozumab reduced the incidence of new vertebral fracture through month 24 (adjusted p-value < 0.001) and the incidence of clinical fracture at primary analysis (adjusted p-value < 0.001) as well as the incidence of non vertebral fractures at primary analysis (adjusted p-value = 0.040) versus treatment with alendronate alone. Table 1 also shows nonvertebral, hip and major osteoporotic fracture risk reduction through primary analysis, month 12 and month 24.
Table 1.
The Effect of romosozumab on the Iincidence and risk of new Vvertebral, clinical, nonvertebral, hip and major osteoporotic fractures in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis
Proportion of women with fracture
Absolute risk reduction (%)
(95% CI)
Relative risk reduction (%)
(95% CI)
Alendronate/ Alendronate (%)
Romosozumab/ Alendronate (%)
New vertebral
Through month 12
85/1703 (5.0)
55/1696 (3.2)
1.84 (0.51, 3.17)
36 (11, 54)
Through month 24
a
147/1834 (8.0)
74/1825 (4.1)
4.03 (2.50, 5.57)
50 (34, 62)
Clinical
b
Through month 12
110/2047 (5.4)
79/2046 (3.9)
1.8 (0.5, 3.1)
28 (4, 46)
Primary analysis (median follow-up approx. 33 months)
266/2047 (13.0)
198/2046 (9.7)
NA
c
27 (12, 39)
Nonvertebral
Through Month 12
95/2047 (4.6)
70/2046 (3.4)
1.4 (0.1, 2.6)
26 (-1, 46)
Primary analysis (median follow-up approx. 33 months)
217/2047 (10.6)
178/2046 (8.7)
NA
c
19 (1, 34)
Hip
Through Month 12
22/2047 (1.1)
14/2046 (0.7)
0.3 (-0.3, 0.9)
36 (-26, 67)
Primary analysis (median follow-up approx. 33 months)
66/2047 (3.2)
41/2046 (2.0)
NA
c
38 (8, 58)
Major osteoporotic
d
Through Month 12
85/2047 (4.2)
61/2046 (3.0)
1.4 (0.3, 2.5)
28 (-1, 48)
Primary analysis (median follow-up approx. 33 months)
209/2047 (10.2)
146/2046 (7.1)
NA
c
32 (16, 45)
a.
Absolute risk reduction and relative risk reduction based on Mantel-Haenszel method adjusted for age strata, baseline total hip BMD T-score (≤ -2.5, > -2.5), and presence of severe vertebral fracture at baseline. Treatment comparisons are based on adjusted logistic regression model.
b.
Clinical fractures include all symptomatic fractures including nonvertebral and painful vertebral fractures. Treatment comparisons are based on Cox proportional hazards model.
c.
NA: not available as subjects have various exposure at primary analysis.
d.
Major osteoporotic fractures include hip, forearm, humerus, and clinical vertebral.
Effect on Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
In postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, romosozumab for 12 months followed by alendronate for 12 months increased BMD compared with alendronate alone at month 12 and 24 (p-value < 0.001) (see Table 2).
Following 12 months of treatment, romosozumab increased BMD at the lumbar spine from baseline in 98% of postmenopausal women.
Table 2. Mean percent change in BMD from baseline through month 12 and month 24 in post-menopausal women with osteoporosis
Alendronate/Alendronate
Mean (95% CI)
N = 2047
a
Romosozumab/Alendronate
Mean (95% CI)
N = 2046
a
Treatment difference from alendronate-to-alendronate
At Month 12
Lumbar spine
5.0 (4.8, 5.2)
12.4 (12.1, 12.7)
7.4
b
(7.0, 7.8)
Total hip
2.9 (2.7, 3.1)
5.8 (5.6, 6.1)
2.9
b
(2.7, 3.2)
Femoral neck
2.0 (1.8, 2.2)
4.9 (4.6, 5.1)
2.8
b
(2.5, 3.2)
At Month 24
Lumbar spine
7.2 (6.9, 7.5)
14.0 (13.6, 14.4)
6.8
b
(6.4, 7.3)
Total hip
3.5 (3.3, 3.7)
6.7 (6.4, 6.9)
3.2
b
(2.9, 3.6)
Femoral neck
2.5 (2.3, 2.8)
5.7 (5.4, 6.0)
3.2
b
(2.8, 3.5)
Means and confidence intervals are based on patients with available data. Based on ANCOVA model; missing values of baseline BMD and BMD percent change from baseline at month 12 and month 24 were imputed by control-based pattern imputation.
a.
Number of women randomized
b.
p-value < 0.001
The significant difference in BMD achieved in the first 12 months was maintained through month 36 upon transition/continuation to alendronate. Treatment differences were observed at 6 months at lumbar spine, total hip and femoral neck.
Study 20070337 (FRAME)
The efficacy and safety of romosozumab in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis was evaluated in a multicenter, multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of 7,180 postmenopausal women aged 55 to 90 years (mean age of 70.9 years). 40.8% of enrolled women had severe osteoporosis with a prior fracture at baseline.
The co-primary efficacy endpoints were the incidence of new vertebral fractures through month 12 and through month 24.
Romosozumab reduced the incidence of new vertebral fractures through month 12 (absolute risk reduction: 1.3% [95% CI: 0.79; 1.80], relative risk reduction: 73% [95% CI: 53; 84], adjusted p-value < 0.001) and after transition to denosumab through month 24 (absolute risk reduction: 1.89 % [95% CI: 1.30; 2.49], relative risk reduction: 75% [95% CI: 60, 84], adjusted p-value < 0.001).
Women transitioning from bisphosphonate therapy
Study 20080289 (STRUCTURE)
The safety and efficacy of romosozumab in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis transitioning from bisphosphonate therapy (92.7% in teriparatide group and 88.1% in romosozumab group had prior alendronate use during the last 3 years) were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, open-label study of 436 postmenopausal women aged 56 to 90 years (mean age of 71.5 years) versus teriparatide.
The primary efficacy variable was percent change in total hip BMD from baseline at month 12. Romosozumab significantly increased BMD at the total hip relative to teriparatide at month 12 (mean treatment difference from Teriparatide: 3.4% [95% CI: 2.8; 4.0], p-value < 0.0001). The trial was not intended to estimate the effect on fractures but there were seven fractures in the romosozumab arm and nine fractures in the teriparatide arm of the study.
Bone Histology and Histomorphometry
In a bone histology sub-study, a total of 154 transiliac crest bone biopsy specimens were obtained from 139 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis at months 2 and 12 (in FRAME study). Qualitative histology assessments showed normal bone architecture and quality at all time points, normal lamellar bone with no evidence of mineralization defects, woven bone, marrow fibrosis, or clinically significant marrow abnormality in patients treated with romosozumab.
Histomorphometry assessments on biopsies at months 2 and 12 in women showed an increase of bone formation parameters and a decrease in bone resorption parameters while bone volume and trabecular thickness were increased in romosozumab group compared to placebo group.
Paediatric population
The European Medicines Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with romosozumab in one or more subsets of the paediatric population in the treatment of osteoporosis. See section 4.2 for information on paediatric use.
⚠️ Warnings
The solution should be visually inspected for particles and discoloration prior to administration. EVENITY should not be used if the solution is discolored, cloudy, or contains particles.
Prior to subcutaneous administration, romosozumab should be allowed to sit at room temperature for at least 30 minutes before injecting. This will help make the injection more comfortable. It should not be warmed in any other way.
Do not shake.
Any unused medicinal product or waste material should be disposed of in accordance with local requirements.